NYU professor argues against nuclear family, monogamy, anti-polygamy laws
| During a law school debate on April 15, New York University professor of social and cultural analysis Judith Stacey argued against the nuclear family and monogamous relationships, and for decriminalizing polygamy.
Among Ms. Stacey’s wicked smart musings: “I say why should there be marriage at all;” “What should limit it to two and why should it be monogamous? Nothing in view gives the state that particular interest;” and “So I would agree that we should get rid of the sexual family, there’s no reason in the contemporary world to base our relationships necessarily on sex.” She also shared that she suspects that because “the children of gay male co-parents will wind up having probably the best parents. … I would say that children certainly do not need both a mother and a father. They need good parents of whatever sort.” |
Publius Prime 
She chucks respect, morals and responsibility out the window. These debates make me “cling” to my old-fashioned values all the more.
Yes, agreed!
“Gay marriage is just another step down the slippery slope.” That’s the argument I was making, what was it? A week ago? And the libturds jumped all over me telling me how stupid I was for even suggesting such a thing.
So, you’d best be ready. The pro-bestiality forces will be right along and NAMBLA will be right behind them. What’s truly funny is how when you’re taking that first step down the slippery slope you can’t tell how steep the slope really is.
We’ve been saying it all along. Homosexual acts are immoral. Two gay men raising a child is absolutely deplorable.