Feinstein tries to cover for Admin’s impotence
Feinstein is so full of SH–!
Fauxbama and crew tried to sweep the murders under the rug dismissing it as a spontaneous response to Americans with an anti-Islam agenda. Yep, blame it on a filmmaker who doesn’t support Islam, it’s his fault Muslims coordinated an attack in multiple countries on the anniversary of 9/11 !!
Where was the security, where was help when it was requested, where is the American response, where are those who should be apprehended and held responsible!
Fauxbama- inept, incommunicado, impotent!
—
House Intel Chair: ‘Appointees from Administration’ Changed Rice’s Talking Points
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) chairs the House Select Committee on Intelligence. (AP Photo)
(CNSNews.com) – Who changed the CIA talking points to minimize the fact that terrorists were behind the attack on the U.S. outposts in Benghazi?
When Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., went on five Sunday talk shows five days later, she was still blaming the attack on a spontaneous protest over an obscure anti-Islam video.
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee, says the unclassified talking points put together by the CIA changed when they got to administration appointees:
“[T]here was not an intelligence failure,” Rogers told “Meet the Press” on Sunday.
“The intelligence community had it right, and they had it right early. What happened was it worked its way up through the system of the so-called talking points, which everyone refers to, and then it went up to what’s called a deputy’s committee…It went to the so-called deputy’s committee, that’s populated by appointees from the administration. That’s where the narrative changed. And so how that thing got back to (Susan) Rice, I think, is probably another question.”
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chair of the Senate intelligence committee, appeared with Rogers on “Meet the Press.” She was asked why the CIA called the attack terrorism from the beginning — but Rice did not:
“Because she could speak publicly only on unclassified speaking points,” Feinstein said. There was concern about naming a terrorist group “until we had some certainty,” Feinstein explained.
