The Anti-Romney Fallacy
The anti-Romney candidate…who is he or she? Where is he or she? This fallacy is what has framed the republican primary from the start, and it’s been repeated enough in the media so that the public has been sufficiently fooled into believing this fallacy is now a fact.
There is no such thing as the anti-Romney candidate. It is a media lie, made up to discredit and possibly doom the Romney campaign since he has been viewed from the start as the best equipped to take down Obama. “Anti” is a buzz word of the liberal left. They use it to demean and discredit their opponent, while falsely presenting themselves as “pro” everything. The rise and fall of each individual candidate was orchestrated by the media as the possible anti-Romney candidate. However, it’s been a farce, all done to discredit Romney as a conservative and made anyone foolish enough to believe these lies think he’s anti-conservative. Really? Seriously? Think about it…Romney not a conservative? I don’t think so.
All of the republican candidates (from the start) are actually not very far apart from each other on the issues. All of the republican candidates are true American conservatives and all would make far superior Presidents to the one who currently resides in this office now.
Publius Prime 
I agree, I don’t know what the media is talking about. I think it’s another media lie. I’m a conservative republican who supports Romney and am excited about a possible Romney presidency because I think he can turn this country around economically. I know both conservatives and moderates who support Romney because of this.
this should be titled the Anti-Romney REALITY” because it most certainly exists. the dems are foamin at the mouth w/ anticipation of Mittens – they created/inspired the occupy poopwipes to corner 1%mitt & axlerod “during” a recent debate said that romney had just given a wonderful explanation of the individual mandate in obama/romneycare! 😦 oh boy bring on the 2012 Dole & McCain loser!! 😦 the Repub”Establishment” also want Romney to ensure their power & control (even is they lose the presidency!) thats how F’d up these pinheads are! NO insurgent TeaParty candidates apply… just consider for a second if we had no Teaparty uprising in 09 & the landslide in 2010 that gave us control of the House…. just imagine the further damage obama would’ve done! the Anti-Romney Reality is the TeaParty/Conservative Candidate who recognizes the risk & importance of not running aaannoooother moderate mushymiddle compromiser… like Mitt. Mitt is a pretender who has always been a moderate! just peer at his record of governance & beliefs “before” he started serial running for prez… from abortion to raising taxes & all big issues in between, he is clearly a moderate – but once a presidential candidate always a conservative – suuuuuuuure you are. But this is the very reason why there is an AntiRomney Reality – us conservatives know we gotta get it right this time and are pissed w/ the estab’s who want to so quickly annoint another mod! we’re quick to embrace the Cains-Santorums-Newts-Bachmans and the Palin support means an awful lot to us! we will demand a traditional conservative w/ TeaParty values this time round and will absolutely stand firm as the Anti-Romney REALITY!
“the company you keep” is also a telling old saying… there’s a reason why the Palins & Perrys & Lone Wolf McQuades of the world endorse Newtie – while the Huntsmen (former obama czar) and John McLames endorse Mittens…
Yep, good point. Fauxbama been surrounding himself with Maoists, communists, statists, socialists. Where’s the patriots, Constitutionalists, war heroes, capitalists, American exceptionalists??
sorry to be the newt in the ointment but the main pt is Newtie kicked some SERIOUS backside! what is coming out & connecting w/ people of all stripes (via debates, interviews, appearances…) is newts very deep knowledge/experience/record & success. He simply reeks of traditional Americana & hits a 10 everytime he effortlessly articulates our systems & successes. proof: check out his success record as speaker & his current Contract w/ America – the dude has Vision! they others pale in comparison & as they try to keep up its glaring (see mitt in SC) – the other contenders went down due to attack ads that intend to diminish and not build up the perperator (see mitt 2008 & 2012) – the others fell including newt BUT he bouyed due to his battle scars… we need this type of conservative gladiator to take on the marxistmachine we’re facing – a well intentioned (w/nice hair) moderate will simply get used & abused… gotta fight fire w/ fire no time for compromise! Newts consistently called obama out for his record & Radicalism (mitt thinks obama just doesn’t understand 😦 call it Anti whatever you’d like but Newties for real & the stars are aligning for a counterpunch and knockout of apollo-blowbama.
Isn’t it somewhat ridiculous that whichever candidate is up in the polls starts taking all kinds of shots from the ‘Protect Obama’ elite media? Bachmann first, then Perry. None of the major news outlets said squat about Bain Capital or Romney tax rates for months. Cain became a rising star and you know how that went. They all got blown out of the water and Romney was the de facto top polling favorite. Then all the criticism comes to bear on him. You’re right, most of the candidates are very close to each other (Paul and Huntsman are not) on the big issues. Any of them will make fine replacements for the outgoing Administration!